Abstract Claims Description Full Text

Abstract

A method of determining a property that affects expression of polynucleotides in an expression system. A plurality of polynucleotides, each encoding a polypeptide sequence, is constructed. An amino acid is encoded a plurality of times in both a first and second polynucleotide in the plurality. The amino acid is encodable by a plurality of synonymous codons including a first codon. The first codon is in the first polynucleotide at a first frequency relative to other synonymous codons, and is in the second polynucleotide at a second frequency relative to other synonymous codons. The first and second frequencies are different. Each polynucleotide is individually expressed in the expression system to measure an expression property value of the polynucleotides, thereby determining a property that affects expression of polynucleotides. The property is an effect that a frequency of use of one or more codons has on expression of polynucleotides in the expression system.

Other References

• Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,234.
• Zhao et al., 2008, “Gene Codon Composition Determines Differentiation-Dependent Expression of a Viral Capsid Gene in Keratinocytes In vitro and In Vivo,” Molecular and Cellular Biology 25, pp. 8643-8655.
• Zeeberg, 2008, “Shannon Information Theoretic Computation of Synonymous Codon Usage Biases in Coding Regions of Human and Mouse Genomes,” Cold Spring Harbor of Laboratory Press 12, pp. 944-955, www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.213402 last accessed Jul. 31, 2008.
• Williams et al., 1988, “Design synthesis and expression of a human interleukin-2 gene incorporating the codon usage bias found in highly expressed Escherichia coli genes,” Nucleic Acids Research, 16:10453-10465.
• Villalobos et al., 2006, “Gene Designer: a synthetic biology tool for constructing artificial DNA segments,” BMC Bioinformatics 7:285 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-285.
• Upton et al., 2002, “A Dictionary of Statistics,” Oxford University Press, pp. 138-139.
• Upton et al., 2002, “A Dictionary of Statistics,” Oxford University Press, pp. 83-84.
• Terpe, K., 2003, “Overview of tag protein fusions: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems,” Appl. Microbiol Biotechnol. 60:523-533.
• Smith et al., 2001, “Synonymous Codon Bias is not Caused by Mutation Bias in G+C Rich Genes in Humans,” Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, pp. 982-986.
• Shields et al., 1987, “Synonymous codon usage in Bacillus subtilis refelects both translational selection and mutational biases,” Nucleic Acids Research 15, pp. 8023-8040.
• Sharp et al., 1987, “The codon adaptation index—a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications,” Nucleic Acids Research, 15:1281-1295.
• Perlak et al., 1991, “Modification of the coding sequence enhances plant expression of insect control protein genes,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88:3324-3328.
• Narum et al., 2001, “Codon Optimization of Gene Fragments Encoding Plasmodium falciparum Merzoite Proteins Enhances DNA Vaccine Protein Expression and Immunogenicity in Mice,” Infection and Immunity 69, pp. 7250-7253.
• McLachlan et al., 1984, “A method for measuring the non-random bias of a codon usage table,” Nucleic Acids Research 12, pp. 9567-9575.
• Makoff et al., 1989, “Expression of tetanus toxin fragment C in E.coli: high level expression by removing rare codons,” Nucleic Acids Research, 17:10191-10202.
• Ko et al., 2005, “Optimization of Codon Usage Enhances the Immunogenicity of a DNA Vaccine Encoding Mycobacterial Antigen Ag85B,” Infection and Immunity 73, pp. 5666-5674.
• Gustafsson et al., 2004, “Codon bias and heterologous protein expression,” Trends in Biotechnology, 22:346-353.
• Gribskov et al., 1984, “The Codon Preference Plot: Graphic Analysis of Protein Coding Sequences and Prediction of Gene Expression,” Nucleic Acids Research 12, pp. 539-549.
• Duret et al., 2000, “Determinants of Substitution Rates in Mammalian Rates in Mammalian Genes: Expression Pattern Affects Selection Intensity but not Mutation Rate,” Biol. Biol. Evol. 17, pp. 68-74.
• Angellotti et al., 2007, “CodonO: codon usage bias analysis within and across genomes,” Nucleic Acids Research 35, Web Server Issue doi:10.1093/nar/gkm392, W132-W136.
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,230, filed Jul. 31, 2008, Welch and Gustafsson.
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,233, filed Jul. 31, 2008, Welch and Gustafsson.
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,234, filed Jul. 31, 2008, Welch and Gustafsson.
• Vervoort et al., 2000, “Optimizing heterologous expression in Dictyostelium: importance of 5' codon adaptation,” Nucleic Acids Res., 28 pp. 2069-2074.
• Hu et al., 1996, “Specific Replacement of Consecutive AGG Codons Results in High-Level Expression of Human Cardiac Troponin T in Escherichia coli,” Protein Expression and Purification 7 pp. 289-293.
• Carton et al., 2007, “Codon engineering for improved antibody expression in mammalian cells,” Protein Expression and Purification 55, pp. 279-286.
• Grote et al., 2005, “JCat: a novel tool to adapt codon usage of a target gene to its potential expression host”, Nucleic Acids Research, 33, Web Server issue doi: 10.1093/nar/gki376, W526-W531.
• Angellotti et al., 2007, “CodonO: codon usage bias analysis within and across genomes”, Nucleic Acids Research, 35, Web Server issue doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm392, W132-W136.
• Duret et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 96, pp. 4482-4487, 1999.
• Fuglsang, A., Gene, vol. 320, pp. 185-190, 2003.
• Fuglsang, A., Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, vol. 86, pp. 135-147, 2004.
• Park et al., Protein Expression and Purification, vol. 24, pp. 470-480, 2002.