U.S. patents available from 1976 to present.
U.S. patent applications available from 2005 to present.

Input systems and methods for the evaluation and optimization of same

Patent 7259751 Issued on August 21, 2007. Estimated Expiration Date: Icon_subject February 3, 2024. Estimated Expiration Date is calculated based on simple USPTO term provisions. It does not account for terminal disclaimers, term adjustments, failure to pay maintenance fees, or other factors which might affect the term of a patent.

Patent References

Method for designing an ergonomic one-finger keyboard and apparatus therefor
Patent #: 5487616
Issued on: 01/30/1996
Inventor: Ichbiah

Method to assess the physical effort to acquire physical targets
Patent #: 5933138
Issued on: 08/03/1999
Inventor: Driskell

Objective, quantitative method for measuring the mental effort of managing a computer-human interface
Patent #: 6295509
Issued on: 09/25/2001
Inventor: Driskell

Device for processing strings
Patent #: 6526401
Issued on: 02/25/2003
Inventor: Ito

Method and apparatus for alphanumeric data entry
Patent #: 6643371
Issued on: 11/04/2003
Inventor: Mager

Method for designing optimal single pointer predictive keyboards and apparatus therefore Patent #: 6646572
Issued on: 11/11/2003
Inventor: Brand

Inventors

Assignee

Application

No. 10771849 filed on 02/03/2004

US Classes:

345/169, Portable (i.e., handheld, calculator, remote controller)400/489, Key-board including keys grouped to facilitate positioning of typist's fingers702/182, Performance or efficiency evaluation707/3, Query processing (i.e., searching)379/355.07, Including modification of indicia associated with a call address341/22Including keyboard or keypad

Examiners

Primary: Hjerpe, Richard
Assistant: Abdulselam, Abbas

Attorney, Agent or Firm

International Class

G09G 5/00

Abstract

A method for evaluating an input system interfacing a human user with an electronic device uses empirically determined bi-action times for users to perform a second input action (e.g., pressing a second key) immediately after performing a first input action (e.g., pressing a first key). The bi-action times (or, more generally, n-action times) are used together with a selected interface map which associates input actions (e.g., pressing keys) to corresponding signifiers (e.g., characters) to calculate a peak expert input rate for the input system. One or more optimized interface maps can be found by combining the evaluation method with any of various optimization strategies. For example, one method for optimizing the input system repeatedly changes the interface map and recalculates the peak expert input rate, while another optimization method calculates peak expert input rates for multiple interface maps in parallel. The evaluation and optimization methods apply to a wide variety of users, input devices, and types of communication and control between them.

Other References

  • “Designing a high-performance soft keyboard,” MacKenzie, I. S., & Zhang, S. Z. (1999). The design and evaluation of a high performance soft keyboard. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI '99, New York: ACM, pp. 25-31.
  • Miika Silfverberg et al., “Predicting text entry speed on mobile phones.” Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI 2000, pp. 9-16, New York.
  • I. Scott Mackenzie et al., “Text entry using soft keyboards.” 1999. Behavior & Information Technology, 18, 235-244.
PatentsPlus Images
Enhanced PDF formats
loading...
PatentsPlus: add to cart
PatentsPlus: add to cartSearch-enhanced full patent PDF image
$9.95more info
PatentsPlus: add to cart
PatentsPlus: add to cartIntelligent turbocharged patent PDFs with marked up images
$16.95more info
 
Sign InRegister
Username  
Password   
forgot password?