Abstract

A centrally tracked artificial currency is provided within the context of an enterprise. This currency serves as a unit of account, medium of exchange, and store of value in a corporate “attention economy.” Users (typically coworkers) in the enterprise are allotted a base number of currency units, which they can earn, exchange, and spend in a variety of ways to signal importance and “purchase” attention of others, or priority for other organization resources. In one aspect, senders of messages can specify an amount of currency to be associated with the message, so that recipients can see the specified amount before deciding whether to read the message. Once such a system is in use, it facilitates exchange of value based on user-created transactions regarding behavior, communication, resources, incentives, and priorities.

Other References

• Davenport, T.H. et al., The Attention Economy, 2001, 264 pages.
• Denning, P.J., “Electronic Junk,” Communications of the ACM, Mar. 1982, pp. 163-165, vol. 25, No. 3.
• Koster, R., “Friday Feature—Economy Stats Apr. 30^th —Game Guides—Star Wars Galaxies Official Forums,” [online] [Retrieved on Apr. 25, 2006] Retrieved from the Internet—guides&message.id=164799.
• Kraut, R. et al., “Markets for Attention: Will Postage for Email Help?” Yale International Center for Finance, Aug. 2002, 12 pages.
• Malone, T.W. et al., “Intelligent Information-Sharing Systems,” Computing Practices, ACM, May 1987, pp. 390-402, vol. 30, No. 5.
• McAdams, D. et al., “Internal Markets for Supply Chain Capacity Allocation,” Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 2005, pp. 1-30.
• Turoff, M., “Information, Value, and the Internal Marketplace,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1985, pp. 357-373, No. 27.
• Van Zandt, T., “Information Overload in a Network of Targeted Communication,” Discussion Paper Series, Jun. 2001, 32 pages.
• International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US06/02870, Mar. 7, 2007, 8 pages.
• Horvitz, E. et al., “Attention-Sensitive Alerting,” Proceedings of UAI '99, Conference on Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence, Jul. 1999, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Francisco. pp. 305-313, [online] [Retrieved on Mar. 14, 2007] Retrieved from the Internet.
• Horvitz, E. et al., “BusyBody: Creating and Fielding Personalized Models of the Cost of Interruption,” Proceedings of CSCW, Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM Press, Nov. 2004, [online] [Retrieved on Mar. 14, 2007] Retrieved from the Internet—cscw.htm>.
• Horvitz, E. et al, “Learning and Reasoning about Interruption,” Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, Nov. 2003, Vancouver, BC, Canada [online] [Retrieved on Mar. 14, 2007] Retrieved from the Internet—cscw.htm>.
• Horvitz, E. et al., Models of Attention in Computing and Communications: From Principles to Applications, Communications of the ACM 46(3):52-59, Mar. 2003, [online] [Retrieved on Mar. 14, 2007] Retrieved from the Internet.
• Van Dantzich, M. et al., “Scope: Providing Awareness of Multiple Notifications at a Glance,” In: Proceedings of AVI 2002, ACM Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, Trento, Italy, May 22-24, 2002. ACM Press, [online] [Retrieved on Mar. 14, 2007] Retrieved from the Internet.