U.S. patents available from 1976 to present.
U.S. patent applications available from 2005 to present.

System and method for adaptive learning

Patent 7052277 Issued on May 30, 2006. Estimated Expiration Date: Icon_subject December 14, 2021. Estimated Expiration Date is calculated based on simple USPTO term provisions. It does not account for terminal disclaimers, term adjustments, failure to pay maintenance fees, or other factors which might affect the term of a patent.

Patent References

3748754

Interactive software training system
Patent #: 4622013
Issued on: 11/11/1986
Inventor: Cerchio

Multi-mode teaching simulator
Patent #: 4772206
Issued on: 09/20/1988
Inventor: Kerr ,   et al.

Air traffic control training system
Patent #: 4979137
Issued on: 12/18/1990
Inventor: Gerstenfeld, et al.

Audio interactive tutor
Patent #: 5540589
Issued on: 07/30/1996
Inventor: Waters

Method and apparatus for automated learning and performance evaluation
Patent #: 5545044
Issued on: 08/13/1996
Inventor: Collins, et al.

Apparatus and method for providing a generic computerized multimedia tutorial interface for training a user on multiple applications
Patent #: 5577186
Issued on: 11/19/1996
Inventor: Mann, II, et al.

Method and apparatus for automated learning and performance evaluation
Patent #: 5577919
Issued on: 11/26/1996
Inventor: Collins, et al.

Apparatus and method for monitoring and improving the alertness of a subject
Patent #: 5595488
Issued on: 01/21/1997
Inventor: Gozlan, et al.

Intelligent tutoring method and system
Patent #: 5597312
Issued on: 01/28/1997
Inventor: Bloom, et al.

More ...

Inventor

Assignee

Application

No. 10020718 filed on 12/14/2001

US Classes:

434/118, COMPUTER LOGIC, OPERATION, OR PROGRAMMING INSTRUCTION434/322, QUESTION OR PROBLEM ELICITING RESPONSE434/323, Cathode ray screen display included in examining means434/362, Electrical means for recording examinee's response434/236PSYCHOLOGY

Examiners

Primary: Harris, Chanda

Attorney, Agent or Firm

Foreign Patent References

  • 0 838 798 EP 04/01/1998

International Classes

G09B 7/00
G09B 19/00

Abstract

An adaptive learning system and method (“ALS”) for optimized, automated learning is disclosed. The optimal sequencing method is adaptive in the sense that it continuously monitors a student's speed and accuracy of response in answering a series of questions, performing a series of classification tasks, or performing a series of procedures, and modifies the sequencing of the items presented as a function of these variables. One goal of the technique is to teach the subject matter in the shortest possible time. The optimal sequencing method may be used independently or in conjunction with disclosed perceptual learning and hinting methods.

Other References

  • Ahissar, Merav, et al.; “Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning,” Nautre; May 1997; pp. 401-406; vol. 387.
  • Bennett, Robert, et al.; “The effect of training on visual alignment discrimination and grating resolution,” Perception & Psychophysics; 1991; pp. 541-546; vol. 49 (6).
  • Chase, William G., et al.; “Perception in Chess,” Cognitive Psychology; 1973; pp. 386-403; vol. 6.4.
  • Fahle, M., et al.; “Fast Perceptual Learning in Hyperacuity,” Vision Research; 1995; pp. 3003-3013; vol. 35, No. 21.
  • Gibson, Eleanor J.; “Towards a Definition and a Taxonomy of Perceptual Learning,” Principles of Perceptual Learning & Development; 1969; pp. 1-9.
  • Gibson, Eleanor J.; “A Differentiation Theory of Perceptual Development,” Principles of Perceptual Learning & Development; 1969; pp. 75-83.
  • Gibson, Eleanor J.; “A Differentiation Theory of Perceptual Development: Principles and Mechanisms,” Principles of Perceptual Learning & Development; 1969; pp. 95-117.
  • Gibson, Eleanor J., et al.; “Three Trends in Perceptual Development,” Principles of Perceptual Learning & Development; 1969; pp. 450-471.
  • Gibson, James J., et al.; “Perceptual Learning : Differentiation or Enrichment?,”Psychological Review; 1955; pp. 33-41; vol. 62, No. 1.
  • Gibson, Eleanor J. et al.; “A Developmental Study of the Discrimination of Letter-Like Forms,” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology;1962; pp. 897-906; vol. 55, No. 6.
  • Goldstone, Robert; “Influences of Categorization on Perceptual Discrimination,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General; 1994; pp. 178-200; vol. 123, No. 2.
  • Karni, Avi, et al.; “The Time Course of Learning a Visual Skill,” Nature; Sep. 1993; pp. 250-252; vol. 365, No. 6443.
  • Kellman, Philip J., et al.; “Modeling Perceptual Learning of Abstract of Invariants,” Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; Aug. 1999; pp. 264-269; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (LEA), Mahwah, New Jersey.
  • Kellman, Philip J., et al.; “Perceptual Learning Modules in Flight Training,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting; 1994; pp. 1183-1187.
  • Kellman, Philip J., et al.; “Training Pilots' Pattern Recognition Skills: Perceptual Learning Modules (PLMs) in Instrument Flight Training,” Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Flight Instructor Conference; Apr. 1999; pp. 85-92; Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Aeronautical Science Department; Daytona Beach, Florida.
  • Laberge, David, “Attention and The Measurement of Perceptual Learning,” Memory & Cognition; 1973; pp. 268-276, vol. 1, No. 3.
  • Merzenich, Michael M., et al.; “Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training,” Science; Jan. 1996; pp. 77-81, vol. 271 (5245).
  • Pick, Anne D.; “Improvement of Visual and Tactual Form Discrimination,” Journal of Experimental Psychology; Apr. 1965; pp. 331-339, vol. 69, No. 4.
  • Reber, Arthur S.; “Implicit Learning of Artificial Grammars,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior; 1967; pp. 855-863, vol. 6.
  • Schneider, Walter, et al.; “Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: I. Detection, Search, and Attention,” Psychological Review; 1977; pp. 1-66; vol. 84, No. 1.
  • Shiffrin, Richard M., et al.; “Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: II. Perceptual Learning, Automatic Attending, and a General Theory,” Psychological Review; Mar. 1977; pp. 127-190; vol. 84, No. 2.
  • Silva, Ana B., et al.; “Perceptual Learning in Mathematics: The Algebra-Geometry Connection,” Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; Aug. 1999; 6 pages; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (LEA), Mahwah, New Jersey.
  • Tallal, Paula, et al.; “Language Learning Impairment: Integrating Research and Remediation,” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology; 1998; pp. 197-199; vol. 39, No. 3; Blackwell Publishers, U.K. and U.S.A.
  • Vogels, Rufin, et al.; “The Effect of Practice on the Oblique Effect in Line Orientation Judgments,” Vision Research; 1985; pp. 1679-1687; vol. 25, No. 11.
  • Wise, Joseph A., et al.; “Perceptual Learning Modules in Mathematics and Science Instruction,” Proceedings of the 2000 TechEd Conference, Amsterdam: IOS Press 2000; 9 pages.
PatentsPlus Images
Enhanced PDF formats
loading...
PatentsPlus: add to cart
PatentsPlus: add to cartSearch-enhanced full patent PDF image
$9.95more info
PatentsPlus: add to cart
PatentsPlus: add to cartIntelligent turbocharged patent PDFs with marked up images
$16.95more info
 
Sign InRegister
Username  
Password   
forgot password?