Patent 7052277 Issued on May 30, 2006. Estimated Expiration Date: December 14, 2021. Estimated Expiration Date is calculated based on simple USPTO term provisions. It does not account for terminal disclaimers, term adjustments, failure to pay maintenance fees, or other factors which might affect the term of a patent.
434/118, COMPUTER LOGIC, OPERATION, OR PROGRAMMING INSTRUCTION434/322, QUESTION OR PROBLEM ELICITING RESPONSE434/323, Cathode ray screen display included in examining means434/362, Electrical means for recording examinee's response434/236PSYCHOLOGY
An adaptive learning system and method (“ALS”) for optimized, automated learning is disclosed. The optimal sequencing method is adaptive in the sense that it continuously monitors a student's speed and accuracy of response in answering a series of questions, performing a series of classification tasks, or performing a series of procedures, and modifies the sequencing of the items presented as a function of these variables. One goal of the technique is to teach the subject matter in the shortest possible time. The optimal sequencing method may be used independently or in conjunction with disclosed perceptual learning and hinting methods.
Other References
Ahissar, Merav, et al.; “Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning,” Nautre; May 1997; pp. 401-406; vol. 387.
Bennett, Robert, et al.; “The effect of training on visual alignment discrimination and grating resolution,” Perception & Psychophysics; 1991; pp. 541-546; vol. 49 (6).
Chase, William G., et al.; “Perception in Chess,” Cognitive Psychology; 1973; pp. 386-403; vol. 6.4.
Fahle, M., et al.; “Fast Perceptual Learning in Hyperacuity,” Vision Research; 1995; pp. 3003-3013; vol. 35, No. 21.
Gibson, Eleanor J.; “Towards a Definition and a Taxonomy of Perceptual Learning,” Principles of Perceptual Learning & Development; 1969; pp. 1-9.
Gibson, Eleanor J.; “A Differentiation Theory of Perceptual Development,” Principles of Perceptual Learning & Development; 1969; pp. 75-83.
Gibson, Eleanor J.; “A Differentiation Theory of Perceptual Development: Principles and Mechanisms,” Principles of Perceptual Learning & Development; 1969; pp. 95-117.
Gibson, Eleanor J., et al.; “Three Trends in Perceptual Development,” Principles of Perceptual Learning & Development; 1969; pp. 450-471.
Gibson, James J., et al.; “Perceptual Learning : Differentiation or Enrichment?,”Psychological Review; 1955; pp. 33-41; vol. 62, No. 1.
Gibson, Eleanor J. et al.; “A Developmental Study of the Discrimination of Letter-Like Forms,” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology;1962; pp. 897-906; vol. 55, No. 6.
Goldstone, Robert; “Influences of Categorization on Perceptual Discrimination,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General; 1994; pp. 178-200; vol. 123, No. 2.
Karni, Avi, et al.; “The Time Course of Learning a Visual Skill,” Nature; Sep. 1993; pp. 250-252; vol. 365, No. 6443.
Kellman, Philip J., et al.; “Modeling Perceptual Learning of Abstract of Invariants,” Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; Aug. 1999; pp. 264-269; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (LEA), Mahwah, New Jersey.
Kellman, Philip J., et al.; “Perceptual Learning Modules in Flight Training,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting; 1994; pp. 1183-1187.
Kellman, Philip J., et al.; “Training Pilots' Pattern Recognition Skills: Perceptual Learning Modules (PLMs) in Instrument Flight Training,” Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Flight Instructor Conference; Apr. 1999; pp. 85-92; Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Aeronautical Science Department; Daytona Beach, Florida.
Laberge, David, “Attention and The Measurement of Perceptual Learning,” Memory & Cognition; 1973; pp. 268-276, vol. 1, No. 3.
Merzenich, Michael M., et al.; “Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training,” Science; Jan. 1996; pp. 77-81, vol. 271 (5245).
Pick, Anne D.; “Improvement of Visual and Tactual Form Discrimination,” Journal of Experimental Psychology; Apr. 1965; pp. 331-339, vol. 69, No. 4.
Reber, Arthur S.; “Implicit Learning of Artificial Grammars,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior; 1967; pp. 855-863, vol. 6.
Schneider, Walter, et al.; “Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: I. Detection, Search, and Attention,” Psychological Review; 1977; pp. 1-66; vol. 84, No. 1.
Shiffrin, Richard M., et al.; “Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: II. Perceptual Learning, Automatic Attending, and a General Theory,” Psychological Review; Mar. 1977; pp. 127-190; vol. 84, No. 2.
Silva, Ana B., et al.; “Perceptual Learning in Mathematics: The Algebra-Geometry Connection,” Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; Aug. 1999; 6 pages; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (LEA), Mahwah, New Jersey.
Tallal, Paula, et al.; “Language Learning Impairment: Integrating Research and Remediation,” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology; 1998; pp. 197-199; vol. 39, No. 3; Blackwell Publishers, U.K. and U.S.A.
Vogels, Rufin, et al.; “The Effect of Practice on the Oblique Effect in Line Orientation Judgments,” Vision Research; 1985; pp. 1679-1687; vol. 25, No. 11.
Wise, Joseph A., et al.; “Perceptual Learning Modules in Mathematics and Science Instruction,” Proceedings of the 2000 TechEd Conference, Amsterdam: IOS Press 2000; 9 pages.