U.S. patents available from 1976 to present.
U.S. patent applications available from 2005 to present.

Method and system for interpreting and validating experimental data with automated reasoning

Patent 6813615 Issued on November 2, 2004. Estimated Expiration Date: Icon_subject September 6, 2020. Estimated Expiration Date is calculated based on simple USPTO term provisions. It does not account for terminal disclaimers, term adjustments, failure to pay maintenance fees, or other factors which might affect the term of a patent.

Patent References

Method and system for generating lexicon of cooccurrence relations in natural language
Patent #: 4942526
Issued on: 07/17/1990
Inventor: Okajima, et al.

Method and apparatus for generating and/or updating cooccurrence relation dictionary
Patent #: 5181163
Issued on: 01/19/1993
Inventor: Nakajima, et al.

Method and apparatus for automated analysis of biological specimens
Patent #: 5235522
Issued on: 08/10/1993
Inventor: Bacus

Automatic expert system
Patent #: 5263126
Issued on: 11/16/1993
Inventor: Chang

Digital data processor with improved backup storage
Patent #: 5276860
Issued on: 01/04/1994
Inventor: Fortier, et al.

Digital data storage system with improved data migration
Patent #: 5276867
Issued on: 01/04/1994
Inventor: Kenley, et al.

Image statement printing system with document storage/retrieval using optical media
Patent #: 5287497
Issued on: 02/15/1994
Inventor: Behera

Comparative molecular field analysis (COMFA)
Patent #: 5307287
Issued on: 04/26/1994
Inventor: Cramer, III, et al.

Knowledge base management system for an information reasoning apparatus
Patent #: 5355445
Issued on: 10/11/1994
Inventor: Shibao, et al.

Method for representation of knowledge in a computer as a network database system
Patent #: 5379366
Issued on: 01/03/1995
Inventor: Noyes

More ...

Inventors

Assignee

Application

No. 09656372 filed on 09/06/2000

US Classes:

706/46, Knowledge representation and reasoning technique706/45, KNOWLEDGE PROCESSING SYSTEM706/47Ruled-based reasoning system

Examiners

Primary: Starks, Wilbert L. Jr.
Assistant: Hirl, Joseph P.

Attorney, Agent or Firm

Foreign Patent References

  • 0 367 544 EP 05/01/1990
  • WO 9106050 WO 05/01/1991
  • WO 9622575 WO 07/01/1996
  • WO9815825 WO 04/01/1998
  • WO 9838490 WO 09/01/1998
  • WO9905323 WO 02/01/1999
  • WO 0015847 WO 03/01/2000

International Classes

G06F 1700
G06N 500

Abstract

A method and system for interpreting experimental data with automated reasoning. Domain specific knowledge is acquired from one or more pharmaceutical information sources. A semantic representation of the domain specific knowledge is created meeting a desired set of criteria. Pharmaceutical data from a knowledge database is classified with the semantic representation, allowing construction of a set of reasons for any classified pharmaceutical data. The set of reasons may help interpret the classified pharmaceutical data to remove errors, such as “physical errors” and “biological errors”. Removing such errors helps improve fusion of knowledge from multiple data, information and knowledge sources which incorporates activity and selectivity against a target, desired pharmacokinetic and toxicity properties enabling selection of potential pharmaceutical compounds. The method and system may improve identification, selection, validation and screening of new real or virtual pharmaceutical compounds or may be used to provide bioinformatic techniques for storing and manipulating pharmaceutical knowledge.

Other References

  • W. Salmonsen, K.Y.C. Mok, P. Kolatkar, S. Subbiah, “BioJAKE: A Tool for the Creation, Visualization and Manipulation of Metabolic Pathways,” Bioinformatics Centre, Jan. 1999, pp. 392-400.
  • W. Fujibuchi, K. Sato, H. Ogata, S. Goto, M. Kanehisa, “KEGG and DBGET/LinkDB: Integration of Biological Relationships in Divergent Molecular Biology Data,” Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, 1998, pp. 35-40.
  • P.D. Karp, “Database Links are a Foundation for Interoperability,” Aug. 1996, pp. 273-279, TibTech, (vol. 14).
  • Paley, P.D. Karp, “Adapting EcoCyc for Use on the World Wide Web,” Gene 172 (1996) GC43-GC50, Mar. 28, 1996, pp. 43-50.
  • P.D. Karp, “Computer Corner-Metabolic Databases,” Mar. 23, 1998, pp. 114-116, TIBS.
  • C. Allee, “Data Management for Automated Drug Discovery Laboratories,” XP-002134398, Aug. 21, 1996, pp. 307-310.
  • A.R. Kerlavage, W. FitzHugh, A. Glodek, J. Kelley, J. Scott, R. Shirley, G. Sutton, Man Wai-Chiu, O. White, M.D. Adams, “Data Management and Analysis for High-Throughput DNA Sequencing Projects,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Nov./Dec. 1995, pp. 710-717.
  • K.A. Giuliano, D. Lansing Taylor, “Flourescent-Protein Biosensors: New Tools for Drug Discovery,” Mar. 1998, pp. 135-140, TibTech (vol. 16).
  • Cellomics Vital Knowledge, Smarter Screening and Lead Optimization with Cellomics™ High content Screening Systems and Informatics Tools In An Integrated Drug Discovery Solution. 1999.
  • K.A. Giuliano, R.L. DeBiasio, R. T.Dunlay, A. Gough, J.M. Volosky, J. Zock, G.N. Pavlakis, D. Lansing Taylor, “High-Content Screening: A New Approach to Easing Key Bottlenecks in the Drug Discovery Process,” Journal of Biomolecular Screening, 1997, pp. 249-259, (vol. 2, No. 4) Winter.
  • B.R. Conway, L.K. Minor, J.Z. Xu, J.W. Gunnet, R. DeBiasio, M.R. D'Andrea, R. Rubin, R. DeBiasio, K. Giuliano, L. Zhou, K.T. Demarest, “Quantification of G-aprotein Couples Receptor Internalization Using G-Protein Coupled Receptor-Green Flourescent Protein Conjugates with the ArrayScan™ High-Content Screening System,” Journal of Biomolecular Screening, 1999, pp. 75-86, (vol. , No. 2), Apr.
  • Ethan B. Arutunian, Deirdre R. Meldrum, Neal A. Friedman and Stephen E. Moody, “Flexible Software Architecture for User-Interface and Machine Control in Laboratory Automation,” BioTechniques 25:698-705 (Oct. 1998).
  • Blaschke et al., “Automatic Extraction Of Biological Information From Scientific Text: Protein-Protein Interactions”, ISMB'99, pp. 60-67.
  • Chen et al., “Automatic Construction Of Networks Of Concepts Characterizing Document Databases”, IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, And Cybernetics, vol. 22, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 1992, pp. 885-902.
  • Chen et al., “An Algorithmic Approach To Concept Exploration In A Large Knowledge Network (Automatic Thesaurus Consultation): Symbolic Branch-And-Bound Search vs. Connectionist Hopfield Net Activation”, Journal Of The American Society For Information Science, 3615), 1995, pp. 348-369.
  • Craven et al., “Constructing Biological Knowledge Bases By Extracting Information From Text Sources”, ISMB'99, pp. 77-86.
  • Gordon et al., “Toward Discovery Support Systems: A Replication, Re-Examination, And Extension Of Swanson's Work On Literature-Based Discovery Of A Connection Between Raynaud's And Fish Oil”, Journal Of The American Society For Information Science, 47(2), 1996, pp. 116-128.
  • Swanson et al., “An Interactive System For Finding Complementary Literatures: A Stimulus To Scientrlic Discovery”, Artifical Intelligence 91 (1997), pp. 183-203.
  • Overbeek et al., “Representation of Function: The Next Step”, Pub. On-line Jan. 31, 1997, www.mcs.anl.gov/compbio/publications/function_pap.html, pp. 1-13.
PatentsPlus Images
Enhanced PDF formats
loading...
PatentsPlus: add to cart
PatentsPlus: add to cartSearch-enhanced full patent PDF image
$9.95more info
PatentsPlus: add to cart
PatentsPlus: add to cartIntelligent turbocharged patent PDFs with marked up images
$16.95more info
 
Sign InRegister
Username  
Password   
forgot password?