U.S. patents available from 1976 to present.
U.S. patent applications available from 2005 to present.

Techniques for objectively measuring discrepancies in human value systems and applications therefor

Patent 6647355 Issued on November 11, 2003. Estimated Expiration Date: Icon_subject June 6, 2021. Estimated Expiration Date is calculated based on simple USPTO term provisions. It does not account for terminal disclaimers, term adjustments, failure to pay maintenance fees, or other factors which might affect the term of a patent.

Patent References

Personal compatibility indicating device
Patent #: 5109789
Issued on: 05/05/1992
Inventor: Berman

Pseudonymous server for system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects
Patent #: 5754938
Issued on: 05/19/1998
Inventor: Herz, et al.

Automated collaborative filtering system
Patent #: 5790426
Issued on: 08/04/1998
Inventor: Robinson

Method and apparatus for matching registered profiles
Patent #: 6052122
Issued on: 04/18/2000
Inventor: Sutcliffe, et al.

System for data collection and matching compatible profiles
Patent #: 6272467
Issued on: 08/07/2001
Inventor: Durand, et al.

Method and system for referral management Patent #: 6457005
Issued on: 09/24/2002
Inventor: Torrey

Inventors

Assignee

Application

No. 09/875611 filed on 06/06/2001

US Classes:

702/179, Statistical measurement705/10Market analysis, demand forecasting or surveying

Examiners

Primary: Huff, Mark F.
Assistant: Barbee, Manuel L.

Attorney, Agent or Firm

International Class

G06Q 10/00 (20060101)

Abstract

Techniques for finding sets of values that are relevant to attaining desired results, determining discrepancies between how different entities regard a set of values, and employing the discrepancies to determine how well individuals "fit" with other individuals or communities, how well communities fit with each other, how an entity's values compare with a desired set thereof, how an entity's values change over time, and what progress an entity is making towards acquiring value hierarchies that are useful in attaining the desired results. All of the techniques involve having entities assign values to hierarchies, with the value's position in the hierarchy being represented by a rating number upon which arithmetic operations may be performed. Discrepancies between value systems may be determined by comparing the rating numbers which the entities assign the values. Values and ratings of them that are useful for attaining a desired result may be found by selecting values that appear to be useful for attaining the desired results and having sources rate the values and specify how well they have attained the desired result. Values and ratings with a high correlation to the desired result can thus be found and used to establish an ideal hierarchy of values for reaching the desired result. Hierarchies of values of entities may then be compared with the ideal hierarchy.

Other References

  • Steven R. Brown, The History and Principles of Q Methodology in Psychology and the Social Sciences, found Jun., 2001 at http://facstaff.uww.edu/cottlec/QArchive/Bps.htm
PatentsPlus Images
Enhanced PDF formats
loading...
PatentsPlus: add to cart
PatentsPlus: add to cartSearch-enhanced full patent PDF image
$9.95more info
PatentsPlus: add to cart
PatentsPlus: add to cartIntelligent turbocharged patent PDFs with marked up images
$16.95more info
 
Sign InRegister
Username  
Password   
forgot password?