U.S. patents available from 1976 to present.
U.S. patent applications available from 2005 to present.

Icon_funbox Bizarre Patents

Patent No. 5823572

Self Defense Weapon With Memo

A self defense weapon formed as a memo pad and which is easily held by a person's fingers, therefore making it possible to provide protection from a mugger and also to quickly and easily write a record or a message without failure of missing or forgetting significant information under a stressful situation.

Newsletter  PatentStorm News

Make the Most of PatentStorm

See this month's Top Inventors and Most Cited Patents.

Stay on top of the latest patents by subscribing to an RSS feed.

Got questions? Ask a Patent Expert!

Registered users: Manage your profile, comments and alerts.

 

US Patent 6556992 - Method and system for rating patents and other intangible assets

US Patent Issued on April 29, 2003
Estimated Patent Expiration Date: Icon_subject September 14, 2020Estimated Expiration Date is calculated based on simple USPTO term provisions. It does not account for terminal disclaimers, term adjustments, failure to pay maintenance fees, or other factors which might affect the term of a patent.
loading...


View Patent Images (PDF)
(Registered users only)

Abstract

A statistical patent rating method and system is provided for independently assessing the relative breadth ("B"), defensibility ("D") and commercial relevance ("R") of individual patent assets and other intangible intellectual property assets. The invention provides new and valuable information that can be used by patent valuation experts, investment advisors, economists and others to help guide future patent investment decisions, licensing programs, patent appraisals, tax valuations, transfer pricing, economic forecasting and planning, and even mediation and/or settlement of patent litigation lawsuits. In one embodiment the invention provides a statistically-based patent rating method and system whereby relative ratings or rankings are generated using a database of patent information by identifying and comparing various characteristics of each individual patent to a statistically determined distribution of the same characteristics within a given patent population. For example, a first population of patents having a known relatively high intrinsic value or quality (e.g. successfully litigated patents) is compared to a second population of patents having a known relatively low intrinsic value or quality (e.g. unsuccessfully litigated patents). Based on a statistical comparison of the two populations, certain characteristics are identified as being more prevalent or more pronounced in one population group or the other to a statistically significant degree. Multiple such statistical comparisons are used to construct and optimize a computer model or computer algorithm that can then be used to predict and/or provide statistically-accurate probabilities of a desired value or quality being present or a future event occurring, given the identified characteristics of an individual patent or group of patents.

Other References

  • Khan, B. Zorina. "Legal Monopoly: Patents and Antitrust Litigation in U.S. Manufacturing, 1970-1998." National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA. Apr., 1999
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. Ex parts Donnor. No. 96-2552, Decided Mar. 26, 1999. 53 USPQ2d, pp. 1699-1702
  • Barron, Russell J. "Better Accounting for Patent Portfolios" Legal Times. Oct. 16, 2000. pp. 91-92
  • Los Angeles Times, "Marketplace of Ideas: Selling Patents Online." Oct. 25, 1999, Section C
  • Malki, Elli "Intellectual Property and the Valuation of Biotechnology Companies: GEN-dex versus Dow Jones." 1997
  • Freewing Aerial Robotics Corporation Determination of Fair Market Value Jun., 1, 1997
  • "Bond Rating," Printout from unknown website. 1997
  • Aurigin Systems, INC. Aureka Cite Module 1998
  • Malki, Elli. "Intellectual Property Intensity (IPI) and the Value-Growth Effect."Nov. 12, 1997
  • Grilliches, Zvi. "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey Part I." National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA. Mar., 1990
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., et al. "Stylized Facts of Patent Litigation: Value, Scope and Ownership." National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA. Mar., 1990
  • Jaffe, Adam B., et al., "International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations." National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA. Apr. 1998
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., et al. "The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: A survey of the Empirical Literature." National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA. Dec., 1997
  • Khan, B. Zorina. "Legal Monopoly: Patents and Antitrust Litiation in U.S. Manufacturing, 1970-1998." National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, MA Apr. 1999
  • Cockburn, Iain, et al., "Industry Effects and Appropriability Measures in the Stock Market's Valuation of R&D and Patents," National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA. Dec., 1987
  • Hall, Bronwyn H. "Innovation and Market Value." National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Feb., 1999
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., et al. "How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data." National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA. Jul., 1996
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., et al. "Stylized Facts of Patent Ligation." National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA. Oct., 1999
  • "Value Relevance of Nonfinancial Information: The Case of Patent Data." Nov. 2001
  • "Intellectual Property," Website: www.edtn.com. Feb. 15, 1999
  • "Patent Claim Analysis." Site Hawk Date Unknown
  • "Empirical Evidence of Patent Validity," AIPLA Quarterly Journal, vol. 28: 185. pp. 187-275. 1998
  • Bramson, Robert S. "Valuing Patents, Technologies and Portfolios: Rules of Thumb." Website: www.ventius.com May 1, 2000
  • Trippe, Anthony. "Software Tools for Analyzing Patents," Website: www.tripp.EPSILON.go-concepts.com. Apr., 1999
  • McGavock, Daniel M. of IPC Group, Inc. "Assessing the Value of your Client's Intellectual Property Rights for Licensing, Sale or Litigation."Presentation for Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP. Sep. 27, 1999
  • "Patent Cafe Website of Satisfy the Inventor's Heartlest Appetite," Desert Maller News. Sep. 21, 1999
  • Rivette, Kevin G., et al. "Discovering New Value in Intellecutual Property." Harvard Business Review. Jan.-Feb., 2000
  • "The Open Platform for Intellectual Property Asset Management" AURGIN products pamphlet for Aureka 7.0 software. 1999
  • Willigan, Walter L "Leveraging Your Intellectual Property: A Proved Path to Value Extraction" Dec., 1998
  • Reitzig, Markus "Improving Patent Valuation Methods for Management Validating Indicators by Understanding Patenting Strategies" Oct., 2001
  • Hall, Bronwyn H "Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look" May, 2001
  • "Calculation of Indicated Market Value" TRRU IP Valuation Report Dec. 14, 2000
  • Multiple Regression http://www.2.chase.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/regress.htm Dec. 13, 2001
  • Survey on Solutions to Prior Art Searching Internet Patent News Service Jun. 30, 1999
  • Patent Evaluation Index, The Japan Technomark Foundation (Mar. 2000)
  • Reifeld, Richard A., "A Macro-economic Model Providing Patent Valuation and Patent Based Company Financial Indicators," 83 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Xoc'y 211(Mar. 2001)
  • Heiden, Bowman J., "The Microeconomic Asset Value of a Patent: An Empiracle Study of Highly valuable Swedish-owned Patents," Center for Intellectual Property Studies Dept. of Industrial Management & Economics, Chalmers University of Technology (Apr. 2001

Inventors

Assignee

Application

No. 661765 filed on 09/14/2000

US Classes:

707/6, Pattern matching access707/7Sorting

Field of Search

707/6, Pattern matching access707/1, DATABASE OR FILE ACCESSING707/2, Access augmentation or optimizing707/3, Query processing (i.e., searching)707/4, Query formulation, input preparation, or translation707/5, Query augmenting and refining (e.g., inexact access)707/7, Sorting707/10, Distributed or remote access707/101, Manipulating data structure (e.g., compression, compaction, compilation)707/102, Generating database or data structure (e.g., via user interface)706/45KNOWLEDGE PROCESSING SYSTEM

Examiners

Primary: Shah, Sanjiv

US Patent References

5175681, Computerized system for managing preparation and prosecution of applications in various countries for protection of industrial property rights
Issued on: 12/29/1992
Inventor: Iwai, et al.
5576954, Process for determination of text relevancy
Issued on: 11/19/1996
Inventor: Driscoll
5608620, Method of eliciting unbiased forecasts by relating a forecaster's pay to the forecaster's contribution to a collective forecast
Issued on: 03/04/1997
Inventor: Lundgren
5680305, System and method for evaluating real estate
Issued on: 10/21/1997
Inventor: Apgar, IV
5694592, Process for determination of text relevancy
Issued on: 12/02/1997
Inventor: Driscoll
5754840, System, method, and computer program product for developing and maintaining documents which includes analyzing a patent application with regards to the specification and claims
Issued on: 05/19/1998
Inventor: Rivette, et al.
5774833, Method for syntactic and semantic analysis of patent text and drawings
Issued on: 06/30/1998
Inventor: Newman
5799325, System, method, and computer program product for generating equivalent text files
Issued on: 08/25/1998
Inventor: Rivette, et al.
5848409, System, method and computer program product for maintaining group hits tables and document index tables for the purpose of searching through individual documents and groups of documents
Issued on: 12/08/1998
Inventor: Ahn
5991751, System, method, and computer program product for patent-centric and group-oriented data processing
Issued on: 11/23/1999
Inventor: Rivette, et al.
5999907, Intellectual property audit system
Issued on: 12/07/1999
Inventor: Donner
6018714, Method of protecting against a change in value of intellectual property, and product providing such protection
Issued on: 01/25/2000
Inventor: Risen, Jr., et al.
6018749, System, method, and computer program product for generating documents using pagination information
Issued on: 01/25/2000
Inventor: Rivette, et al.
6038561, Management and analysis of document information text
Issued on: 03/14/2000
Inventor: Snyder, et al.
6154725, Intellectual property (IP) computer-implemented audit system optionally over network architecture, and computer program product for same
Issued on: 11/28/2000
Inventor: Donner
6175824, Method and apparatus for choosing a stock portfolio, based on patent indicators
Issued on: 01/16/2001
Inventor: Breitzman, et al.
6202058, System for ranking the relevance of information objects accessed by computer users
Issued on: 03/13/2001
Inventor: Rose, et al.
6263314, Method of performing intellectual property (IP) audit optionally over network architecture
Issued on: 07/17/2001
Inventor: Donner
6330547, Method and apparatus for establishing and enhancing the creditworthiness of intellectual property
Issued on: 12/11/2001
Inventor: Martin
6389418Patent data mining method and apparatus
Issued on: 05/14/2002
Inventor: Boyack, et al.

Foreign Patent References

  • 2002/0002524 Kossovsky et al. 01/09/2010
  • 2002/0004775 Kossovsky et al. 01/09/2010
  • 2002/0022974 Lindh. 02/09/2010
  • 2002/0035499 Germeraad et al. 03/09/2010
  • 2002/0046038 Prokoski. 04/09/2010
  • 2002/0077835 Hagelin. 06/09/2010
  • 2002/0087422 Reader. 07/09/2010
  • 2002/0099638 Wilkenson et al. 07/09/2010
  • 1 215 599 EP. 06/09/2010
  • WO 00/75851 WO. 12/09/2010
  • WO 01/35277 WO. 05/09/2010

International Class

G06F 017/30

Comments

No comments for this page
 
 
Forgot password?
Register here