Collaborative recommendations using item-to-item similarity mappings
Patent 6266649 Issued on July 24, 2001. Estimated Expiration Date: September 18, 2018. Estimated Expiration Date is calculated based on simple USPTO term provisions. It does not account for terminal disclaimers, term adjustments, failure to pay maintenance fees, or other factors which might affect the term of a patent.
705/26, Electronic shopping (e.g., remote ordering)705/14, Distribution or redemption of coupon, or incentive or promotion program705/27Presentation of image or description of sales item (e.g., electronic catalog browsing)
A recommendations service recommends items to individual users based on a set of items that are known to be of interest to the user, such as a set of items previously purchased by the user. In the disclosed embodiments, the service is used to recommend products to users of a merchant's Web site. The service generates the recommendations using a previously-generated table which maps items to lists of "similar" items. The similarities reflected by the table are based on the collective interests of the community of users. For example, in one embodiment, the similarities are based on correlations between the purchases of items by users (e.g., items A and B are similar because a relatively large portion of the users that purchased item A also bought item B). The table also includes scores which indicate degrees of similarity between individual items. To generate personal recommendations, the service retrieves from the table the similar items lists corresponding to the items known to be of interest to the user. These similar items lists are appropriately combined into a single list, which is then sorted (based on combined similarity scores) and filtered to generate a list of recommended items. Also disclosed are various methods for using the current and/or past contents of a user's electronic shopping cart to generate recommendations. In one embodiment, the user can create multiple shopping carts, and can use the recommendation service to obtain recommendations that are specific to a designated shopping cart. In another embodiment, the recommendations are generated based on the current contents of a user's shopping cart, so that the recommendations tend to correspond to the current shopping task being performed by the user.
Other References
Joaquin Delgado, "Intelligent Collaborative Information Retrieval".
Joaquin Delgado, "Content-based Collaborative Information Filtering".
Marko Balabanovic and Yoav Shoham, "Content-Based, Collaborative Recommendation," Communications of the ACM, v 40n3, pp. 66-72, Mar. 1997.
"Net Perceptions Closes Second Round of Financing: GroupLens secures No. 1 recommendation system spot with strong endorsement by investment community", Business Wire, p.3020013, Dialog File 16, AN 05495619, Mar. 1998.
"LinkShare Launches Affiliates Profiling Software; First to Integrate Personalization Software Into Affiliates Program", PR Newswire, LinkShare Corp., Dialog File 813 AN 1232636, Feb. 1998.
"Fort Point Partners Teams With LikeMinds to Offer Breakthrough Personalization Technology for Increased Sales Online", Business Wire, p.3110064, Dialog File 16, AN 05510541, Mar. 1998.
"Net Perceptions Debuts GroupLens Version 3.0 at Internet World Spring; `Industrial Strength Tool Matures Into Essential Website Technology`", Business Wire, p. 3090007, Dialog File 16, AN 05505690, Mar. 1998.
"Home Box Office Selects Like Minds Personalization Software for Second Network Site", PR Newswire, p. 1117SFM023, Dialog File 148, AN 09869396, Nov. 1997.
"GroupLens Recommendation Engine to Standardize Internet Personalization For Singapore's Online Technologies Consortium", Business Wire, Dialog File 20, AN 01951318, Jun. 1998.
Borchers, A. et al., "Ganging up on Information Overload", Computer, pp. 106-108, Apr. 1998.
Konstan, J. et al., "GroupLens: Applying Collaborative Filtering to Usenet News", Communications of the ACM, vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 77-87, Mar. 1997.
Miller, B. et al., "Experiences with GroupLens: Making Usenet Useful Again", 1997 Annual Technical Conference, pp. 219-232, 1997.
Resnick, P. et al., "Recommender Systems", Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 56-58, Mar. 1997.
Rucker J. et al., "Siteseer: Personalized Navigation for the Web", Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 73-76, Mar. 1997.
Brier, S.E., "Smart Devices Peep Into Your Grocery Cart", New York Times Co., Section G, p. 3, Col. 3, Circuits, Jul. 1998.
"COSMOCOM", Computer Telephony, p. 124, Jul. 1998.
McMains, A., "Weiss, Whitten, Staliano's", ADWEEK Eastern Edition, vol. 39, No. 24, p. 82, Jun. 1998.
"Cdnow Rated Top Music Site by eMarketer, the Authority on Business Online", PR Newswire, Sep. 1998.
Upendra Shardanand and Pattie Maes with MIT Media-Lab, Social Information Filtering: Algorithms for Automating "Word of Mouth", 8 pgs (undated)
Combining Social Networks and Collaborative Filtering, Communications of the ACM, Mar. 1997/vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 63-65
Pointing the Way: Active Collaborative Filtering, CHI '95 Proceedings Papers, 11 pgs
Bradley N. Miller, John T. Riedl, Joseph A. Konstan with Department of Computer Science, University of Minnesota, Experiences with GroupLens: Making Usenet Useful Again, 13 pgs (undated)
A System for Sharing Recommendations, Communications of the ACM, Mar. 1997/vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 59-62
Recommender Systems for Evaluating Computer Messages, Communications of the ACM, Mar. 1997/vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 88 and 89
Content-Based, Collaborative Recommendation, Communications of the ACM, Mar. 1997/vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 66-72
Applying Collaborative Filtering to Usenet News, Communications of the ACM, Mar. 1997/vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 77-87
Personalized Navigation for the Web, Communications of the ACM, Mar. 1997/vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 73-76
GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews, 18 pgs
Net Perceptions, Inc., White Paper, Building Customer Loyalty and High-Yield Relationships Through GroupLens Collaborative Filtering, 9 pgs., Nov. 22, 1996
Christos Faloutsos and Douglas Oard with University of Maryland, A Survey of Information Retrieval and Filtering Methods, 22 pgs. (undated
September 18, 2018. Estimated Expiration Date is calculated based on simple USPTO term provisions. It does not account for terminal disclaimers, term adjustments, failure to pay maintenance fees, or other factors which might affect the term of a patent.
