Abstract

This is a procedure for determining text relevancy and can be used to enhance the retrieval of text documents by search queries. This system helps a user intelligently and rapidly locate information found in large textual databases. A first embodiment determines the common meanings between each word in the query and each word in the document. Then an adjustment is made for words in the query that are not in the documents. Further, weights are calculated for both the semantic components in the query and the semantic components in the documents. These weights are multiplied together, and their products are subsequently added to one another to determine a real value number (similarity coefficient) for each document. Finally, the documents are sorted in sequential order according to their real value number from largest to smallest value. Another, embodiment is for routing documents to topics/headings (sometimes referred to as filtering). Here, the importance of each word in both topics and documents are calculated. Then, the real value number (similarity coefficient) for each document is determined. Then each document is routed one at a time according to their respective real value numbers to one or more topics. Finally, once the documents are located with their topics, the documents can be sorted. This system can be used to search and route all kinds of document collections, such as collections of legal documents, medical documents, news stories, and patents.

Other References

• Lopez de Mantaras et al., "Knowledge engineering for a document retrieval system," Fuzzy Information and Database Systems, Nov. 1990, v38, n2, pp. 223-240
• Glavitsh et al., "Speech Retrieval in a Multimedia System," Elvesier Science Publishers, copyright 1992, pp. 295-298
• Mulder, "TextWise's plain-speaking software may repave information highway," Syracuse Herald American, Oct. 39, 1994, 2 pages
• Pritchard-Schoch, "Natural language comes of age," Online, v17, n3, May 1993, pp. 33-43 (renumbered Jan. 17)
• Rich et al., "Semantic Analysis," Artificial Intelligence, Chapter 15.3, copyright 1991, pp. 397-414
• Dialog Abstract--Driscoll et al., "The QA System," Text Retrieval Conference, Nov. 4-6, 1992, one page
• Dialog Abstract--Driscoll et al. conference papers, 1991, 1992, three pages
• Dialog Abstract--Doyle, "Some Compromises Between Word Grouping and Document Grouping," System Development Corporation, journal announcement, Mar. 1964, 24 pages
• Dialog Abstract--Marshakova, "Document classification on a lexical basis (keyword based)," Nauchno Teknicheskaya Informatsiya (Russian journal), Seriya 2, No. 5, 1974, pp. 3-10
• Dialog Abstract--Glavitsch et al., "Speech retrieval in a multimedia system," Proceedings of EUSIPCO-92, Sixth European Signal Processing Conference, vol. 1, Aug. 24-27, 1992, pp. 295-298
• Dialog Abstract--Cagan, "automatic probabilistic document retrieval system," Dissertation: Washington State University, 243 pages
• Dialog Abstract--De Mantaras et al., "Knowledge engineering for a document retrieval system," Fuzzy Sets and Systems, v38, n2, Nov. 20, 1990, pp. 223-240
• Dialog Abstract--Dunlap et al., "Integration of user profiles into the p-norm retrieval model," Canadian Journal of Information Science, v15, n1, Apr. 1990, pp. 1-20
• Dialog Target Feature Description and "How-To" Guide, Nov. 1993 and Dec. 1993, reprectively, 19 pages
• Driscoll et al., Text Retrieval Using a Comprehensive Semantic Lexicon, Proceedings of ISMM Interantional Conference, Nov. 8-11, 1992, pp. 120-129
• Driscoll et al., The QA System: The First Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-1), NIST Special Publication 500-207, Mar., 1993, pp. 199-20