U.S. patents available from 1976 to present.
U.S. patent applications available from 2005 to present.

Computer-based method and apparatus for interactive computer-assisted negotiations

Patent 5495412 Issued on February 27, 1996. Estimated Expiration Date: Icon_subject July 15, 2014. Estimated Expiration Date is calculated based on simple USPTO term provisions. It does not account for terminal disclaimers, term adjustments, failure to pay maintenance fees, or other factors which might affect the term of a patent.

Inventor

Assignee

Application

No. 275521 filed on 07/15/1994

US Classes:

705/1, AUTOMATED ELECTRICAL FINANCIAL OR BUSINESS PRACTICE OR MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENT705/10, Market analysis, demand forecasting or surveying715/751Computer supported collaborative work between plural users

Examiners

Primary: McElheny, Donald Jr.

Attorney, Agent or Firm

International Class

G06F 019/00

Abstract

A computer-based method and apparatus for interactive computer-assisted negotiations assists multiple parties involved in complex multiple issue negotiations in reaching an agreement that optimizes both the individual and overall benefit to the parties. Each of the parties to a conflict or dispute to be negotiated enters their preferences concerning each issue of the conflict into a computer system. If desired, each party to the dispute can have a separate computer system so that each party's preference information remains confidential to that party. The preference information includes data on satisfaction functions for each of the issues which defines a party's relative level of satisfaction as a function of a numerical value for the outcome of that issue. Each party may also enter one or more proposed alternative agreements which provide the party with a specified level of satisfaction. Using standard mixed integer linear programming techniques, the preference information is employed to solve an optimization problem in which an alternative agreement, known as the common base if accepted by all parties, is first generated that provides at least the same level of satisfaction to each party that their own proposal provides, while at the same time minimizing the maximum gain and satisfaction achieved by any party between their proposal and the generated alternative agreement. Next, an optimal agreement to the conflict is determined, again using linear programming techniques, by maximizing the minimum gain in satisfaction achieved by each of the parties in going from the common base to the improved alternative. This will, at the same time, maximize the overall benefit to all of the parties. For maximum security of all party's confidential information, a separate computer system located at a neutral site can be connected to each individual party's computer system. In this case, alternatives are generated at the neutral site and transmitted back to each party's own computer system.

Other References

  • Schuler, D., Conference Title: DIAC-88: Directions and Implications of Advanced Computing, Aug. 1988, pp. 84-101
  • Thiessen, Ernest M. et al., "Computer Assisted Negotiation of Multiobjective Water Resources Conflicts", Water Resources Bulletin, vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 163-167, Feb. 1992
  • Thiessen, Ernest Marvin, "ICANS: An Interactive Computer-Assisted Multiparty Negotiation Support System", A Dissertation (Cornell University), pp. 1-157 Jan. 1993, (not shelved until after Jul. 19, 1993)
  • Rangaswamy, Arvind, "Using Computers to Realize Joint Gains in Negotiations: Toward an Electronic Bargaining Table", pp. 1-43, Mar. 199
PatentsPlus Images
Enhanced PDF formats
loading...
PatentsPlus: add to cart
PatentsPlus: add to cartSearch-enhanced full patent PDF image
$9.95more info
PatentsPlus: add to cart
PatentsPlus: add to cartIntelligent turbocharged patent PDFs with marked up images
$18.95more info
 
Sign InRegister
Username  
Password   
forgot password?