U.S. patents available from 1976 to present.
U.S. patent applications available from 2005 to present.

Photomask inspection apparatus and method with improved defect detection

Patent 4579455 Issued on April 1, 1986. Estimated Expiration Date: Icon_subject May 9, 2003. Estimated Expiration Date is calculated based on simple USPTO term provisions. It does not account for terminal disclaimers, term adjustments, failure to pay maintenance fees, or other factors which might affect the term of a patent.

Patent References

Automatic photomask inspection system and apparatus
Patent #: 4247203
Issued on: 01/27/1981
Inventor: Levy ,   et al.

Method and device for inspecting the defect of a pattern represented on an article
Patent #: 4345312
Issued on: 08/17/1982
Inventor: Yasuye ,   et al.

Automatic photomask inspection system and apparatus Patent #: 4347001
Issued on: 08/31/1982
Inventor: Levy ,   et al.

Inventors

Assignee

Application

No. 06/492658 filed on 05/09/1983

US Classes:

356/394, With comparison to master, desired shape, or reference voltage348/125, Flaw detector356/398With object being compared and light beam moved relative to each other (e.g., scanning)

Examiners

Primary: Rosenberger, R. A.
Assistant: Cooper, Crystal D.

Attorney, Agent or Firm

International Class

G06T 7/00 (20060101)

Abstract

Apparatus 20 for inspecting photomasks 26 and the like by comparison of duplicate die patterns, including improved defect detection. Two-dimensional pixel representations of two die patterns are formed, with pixels having values or black or white or shades or grey, depending upon the features of the die patterns. Defects in the die patterns are found by a defect detector circuit 60 at points of non-agreement between the pixel representations. Two window matrices 130 and 134 of adjacent pixels are defined for corresponding areas of the two die patterns. The center matrix of each window matrix is defined as a comparison matrix 132 and 136. An error value is computed for subsets of the window matrix by summing the squares of the differences between each of the pixel values of each subset and the corresponding pixel values of the opposite comparison matrix. If there is no defect and any misalignment between the two representations minimal, at least one error value will be less than a threshold error value. If none of the error values are less than the threshold error value, a defect is assumed. The magnitude of the threshold error value is automatically varied according to the number and type of edges within the window matrices to compensate for edge quantization errors of less than one pixel.

PatentsPlus Images
Enhanced PDF formats
loading...
PatentsPlus: add to cart
PatentsPlus: add to cartSearch-enhanced full patent PDF image
$9.95more info
PatentsPlus: add to cart
PatentsPlus: add to cartIntelligent turbocharged patent PDFs with marked up images
$16.95more info
 
Sign InRegister
Username  
Password   
forgot password?