Backup roll of the built-up type
Patent 4094050 Issued on June 13, 1978. Estimated Expiration Date: 
June 13, 1995. Estimated Expiration Date is calculated based on simple USPTO term provisions. It does not account for terminal disclaimers, term adjustments, failure to pay maintenance fees, or other factors which might affect the term of a patent.
June 13, 1995. Estimated Expiration Date is calculated based on simple USPTO term provisions. It does not account for terminal disclaimers, term adjustments, failure to pay maintenance fees, or other factors which might affect the term of a patent.Patent References 2018247 2215424 InventorAssigneeApplicationNo. 05/768616 filed on 02/14/1977US Classes:492/1METAL DEFORMING ROLLExaminersPrimary: Guest, Alfred R.Attorney, Agent or FirmInternational ClassB21B 27/03 (20060101)DescriptionBACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention relates to rolls for use in rolling-mills and more particularly to backup rolls of the built-up type comprising an arbour and a sleeve which is shrinkage-fitted onto the arbour. In the field of the backup rolls of this type heretofore many inventions have been developed with regard to shrinkage-fitting of a sleeve and an arbour, but most of them have had to solve a residual deformation of the roll which occurs during theactual rolling operation; however, the solutions already proposed require a very implicated constitution which results in making the actual application difficult. Accordingly, if the inventions already proposed in the past were actually useful so as tobe practiced easily industrially, all questions relating at present in the art to the rolling operation would have been completely solved. But since almost all of the solutions put forward were those which had not fully considered the actualcircumstances as abovementioned, questions inherent to built-up type backup rolls still exist. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION An object of the present invention is to provide a backup roll of the built-up type which maybe industrially practiced easily and without all of the defects inherent to conventional rolls as abovementioned. A further object of the present invention is to provide a backup roll of the built-up type which is resistant to either cracking or breaking in the sleeve. In accordance with the present invention a backup roll of the built-up type comprising an arbour and a sleeve shrinkage-fitted onto the arbour is provided wherein the shrinkage-fitting surface formed between the outer surface of the arbour andthe inner surface of the sleeve are provided with an inward stepped shrinkage-fitting portion and outward shrinkage-fitting portions. The inward stepped shrinkage-fitting portion is formed on substantially a mid portion of the shrinkage-fitting surfacein the direction of the axis by shaping an annular protrusion around the arbour which has a limited length and shaping an annular dent around the sleeve which corresponds substantially to the protrusion shaped around the arbour. The outwardshrinkage-fitting portions are formed on the shrinkage-fitting surface at both sides of the inward stepped shrinkage-fitting portion so as to extend to the outer ends of the shrinkage-fitting surface. Thus the shrinkage ratio of the inward steppedshrinkage-fitting portion is selected to be as small as possible in so far as it can prevent relative rotation between the arbour and the sleeve, whereas the shrinkage ratio of the outward shrinkage-fitting portions is selected to be far less than thatof the inward stepped shrinkage-fitting portion. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the length of the inward stepped shrinkage-fitting portion is selected to be one tenth to one fourth of the length of the shrinkage-fitting surface, andthe shrinkage ratio is selected to be 0.1/1000 to 0.3/1000, the shrinkage ratio of the outward shrinkage-fitting portions being selected to be equal to or less than 0.1/1000, or even zero. In another embodiment of the present invention it is also contemplated that an appropriate rounding is provided at the root corners of the annular protrusion of the arbour. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS These and other objects of the present invention will become more readily apparent upon reading of the following specification and upon referring to the accompanying drawings, in which: FIG. 1 is a diagrammatical view of a backup roll of the built-up type according to the teaching of a conventional overhang type: FIG. 2A to 2D are diagrammatical views showing the relation of an axial residual stress and a residual deflection in a backup roll of the built-up type; FIG. 3 is a diagrammatical view of a backup roll of the built-up type which has a barrel-like shrinkage-fitting surface according to the teaching of one of the conventional constructions; FIG. 4 is a diagrammatical view of one of the embodiments of a backup roll of the back-up type according to the present invention; FIG. 5A to 5C are diagrammatical representations showing the process of the assembly of the roll shown in FIG. 4; and FIG. 6 is a partial longitudinal sectional view of the roll shown in FIG. 4 in an enlarged scale to show the detail of the stepped part of the arbour. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT The crack occurring in a sleeve of a backup roll of the built-up type is caused by a sudden development of cracks which can occur by an end spalling, heat shock, etc. due to circumferential residual stress which is inevitably caused at the timeof shrinkage-fitting the sleeve and the arbour. Accordingly, as a countermeasure therefor, it is desirable in order to reduce a shrinkage-fitting hoop stress as far as possible that a minimum shrinkage ratio be to be adopted, and in the extreme caseeven a zero shrinkage ratio is theoretically desirable. However, in reality, since the temperature of the backup rolls rises during their rolling operation, the sleeve expands to finally cause a relative axial shift between it and the arbour, thus therolling operation becomes inpossible. As a countermeasure therefor, as shown in FIG. 1 of the attached drawings, a constitution hitherto referred to as an overhang type has been adopted in which a sleeve 1 and an arbour 2 are provided with an annulardetent 3 and an annular protrusion 4 near one of their ends respectively. This way they can engage one another so as to confine the relative shift between them. In this case, it is unavoidable, however, that an axial tensile residual stress will occurdue to inequality in the cooling velocity of the sleeve 1 at portions other than the engaging portions 3, 4. Consequently, as shown in FIGS. 2A to 2D a deformation due to the residual stress can easily appear because of the load caused by the rollingoperation. FIG. 2A shows shearing stress τ1 caused at a shrinkage-fitting operation of the roll together with an axial tensile stress T; FIG. 2B shows shearing stress τ2 occuring when it is subjected to a compressive load P; FIG. 2Cshows the combined shearing stress of the shearing stress τ1 due to the shrinkage-fitting and shearing stress τ2 due to bending upon application of the compressive load; and FIG. 2D shows a condition occurring due to a residualdeformation. As to the detailed study, reference should be made to a publication entitled "Desertations" published by the Japan Learned Society of Mechanical Engineer, Vol. 32, No. 233, January 1966, pp 6 and the following. As another solution that has is also known from Japanese Patent Publication No. 2247/1967 is that shown in FIG. 3. The shrinkage-fitting surfaces of a sleeve 1 and an arbour 2 of a backup roll of the built-up type are machined so as to have asmooth barrel configuration with the shrinkage ratio being gradually decreased from the mid portion of the sleeve 1 towards both ends in such a manner that the shrinkage ratio is 1 to 0.5/1000 at the mid portion and 0 to 0.1/1000 or 0 to 1/1000 at bothends, respectively. Although this solution may serve to remarkably decrease axial tensile stress it serves only to solve residual bending, because it necessiates a high shrinkage ratio at the mid-portion so that circumferential tensile stress cannot berelieved. The present invention was achieved as a result of precise research for the object of the actualizing a theoretical fact that it is desirable for a shrinkage ratio in a back-up roll of the built-up type to be zero over the axial length of the rollas wide as possible. In reality the present invention can actualize a back-up roll of this type without easily compromising this fact. That is, in the present invention, without being adhered to the conventional overhang type roll as previouslyexplained, as shown in FIG. 4, a back-up roll of the built-up type comprising an arbour 2 and a sleeve 1 is provided with an inward stepped shrinkage-fitting portion 10 on a shrinkage-fitting surface formed between the outer surface of the arbour 2 andthe inner surface of the sleeve 1 at their mid portions in the axial direction, and the portion 10 is an annular protrusion 11 having a limited length shaped around the arbour 2 with a corresponding annular dent 12 shaped around the sleeve 1. Further,the back-up roll according to the present invention is provided with outward shrinkage-fitting portions 13, 14 on the shrinkage-fitting surface at both sides of the inward stepped shrinkage-fitting portion 10. In this case, the shrinkage ratio of theinward stepped shrinkage-fitting portion 10 is selected to an estimate so small that it can scarcely prevent the relative rotation between the sleeve 1 and the arbour 2 which may occur during the rolling operation. In other words, it is estimated to aminimum in so far as it is possible to transmit a torque between both, and the shrinkgate ratio of the outward shrinkage-fitting portions 13, 14 is selected to less than that of the inward stepped shrinkage-fitting portion 10. In the extreme case, itmay be selected to be even zero. The discussion of the inward stepped shrinkage-fitting portion 10 measured in the axial direction can be obtained from a formula of the transmission of torque between a sleeve and an arbour as described e.g. in a publication by "Kawasaki SteelManufacturing Technical Reports" April 1975, page 102 and the following. However, in a practical application, it has been found to be out of the question that as shown in FIG. 4, the width l1 of the inward stepped shrinkage-fitting portion 10formed at the middle of the sleeve 1 and the arbour 2 is selected to be one tenth to one fourth of their length l and the shrinkage ratio 0.1/1000 to 0.3/1000. Further, as to the height of the annular protrusion 11 of the arbour 2 or the depth of theannular dent 12 of the sleeve 1 it should be selected so as not to disturb the shrinkage-fitting operation of the arbour 2 onto the sleeve 1 at the time of their built-up operation which is to be explained more fully afterwards. As to the details of the shape of the inward stepped shrinkage-fitting portion 10, as exaggerated in FIGS. 5A to 5C, the outer diameters of the shrinkage-fitting surfaces 13, 14 of the arbour 2 or the inner diameters of that of the sleeve 1 aremade so as to be different between both sides of the inward stopped shrinkage-fitting portion 10, thus an annular protrusion 11 having different heights at both its ends is formed on the arbour 2 or an annular dent 12 having different depths at both itsends is formed. Thus, on assembly the arbour 2 is introduced into the heated sleeve 1 from the side having a smaller outer diameter on its shrinkage-fitting surface as shown in FIG. 5A until the annular end surface of the annular protrusion 11 having alarger height abuts against the annular end surface of the annular dent 12 of the sleeve 1 having a larger depth. This prevents the protrusion 11 of the arbour 2 from going past the dent 12 of the sleeve 1, and in this state the sleeve 1 and the arbour2 come into contact firstly at the inward stepped shrinkage-fitting portion 10 having a larger shrinkage ratio as shown in FIG. 5B. After the sleeve 1 has completely cooled to be fully contracted, as shown in FIG. 5C, it comes into contact with thearbour 2 on their entire surfaces of the outward shrinkage-fitting portions 13, 14. Thus it will be appreciated that the back-up roll according to the present invention can also exhibit a similar effect as that shown in FIG. 3, that is, it caneffectively reduce axial residual stress so that a residual deformation can be effectively eliminated. Further, in practicing the present invention explained so far, care should be taken that in order to avoid a stress concentration occurring at the corner ends of the annular protrusion 11 of the arbour 2, an appropriate rounding 15 having adefinite radius of curvature is to be shaped so as to relieve the stress concentration at those portions as shown in FIG. 6. This procedure makes it possible to effectively avoid the breaking of the arbour due to the stress concentration. In this casethe radius of the curvature of 5 mm may be applied to almost all of the backup rolls according to the present invention. Further it is also preferable for the corner ends of the annular dent 12 of the sleeve 1 to be rounded as shown in FIG. 6. In thiscase the radius of curvature of this rounding may be 0.5 mm. |
